![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
StatisticsMotor vehicle crashes are a major cause of death and injury in the United States and unfortunately, children are not excluded from these statistics. In fact, 2004 data show that motor vehicle crashes are the leading cause of death for children between the ages of three and fourteen. In 2004, an average of six children under the age of fourteen were killed every day and another 694 were injured due to motor vehicle crashes. (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 2004). For 2003, information from Safe Kids Worldwide indicates that 1,591 child occupants under age fourteen died in motor vehicle crashes and an estimated 220,000 children were injured (n.d.).
Figure 1
Figure 2
Insurance Institute for Highway Safety; Fatality Facts 2004: Children While fatality rates have decreased due to motor vehicle crashes, deaths are still high due to increasing population size. Also the number of miles Americans travel has nearly doubled in the Populations Most at Risk
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Human |
||
|
Pre-Injury
|
Injury
|
Post-Injury
|
| Vehicle & Equipment | ||
Pre-Injury
|
Injury
|
Post-Injury
|
| Physical Environment | ||
Pre-Injury
|
Injury
|
Post-Injury
|
| Socio-Economic Factors | ||
Pre-Injury
|
Injury
|
Post-Injury
|
William Haddon proposed ten strategies that can be used by injury prevention specialists to prevent and control injuries. They are listed here:
Haddon's 10 Strategies (Haddon, 1970)
Ultimately, the strategy that keeps children safest is the first of Haddon's Strategies: to prevent to creation of the hazard in the first place. This is not feasible in this case because it would involve banning cars, something that would not go over well with the American public. As a culture, we are very dependant on our automobiles to get around.
There are many strategies already in place to prevent brain injuries in children under 14 in motor vehicle crashes. For example, airbags are a passive restraint that would fall under Haddon's strategy four and six, and are required on the front driver and passenger side of all cars sold in the United States. The strategies that we can affect with policy regarding traffic safety are to prevent the release of the hazard and to modify the release of the hazard. Preventing the release of the hazard involves making sure vehicles do not crash into each other while on the roads, and modifying the release of the hazard involves technology such as seat belts, air bags, and car seats.
Legislation plays a part in several means of reducing injuries and crashes. The Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, whose organization is dedicated to reducing deaths and injuries from crashes on the nation's highways, has rated all states on various types of legislation pertaining to the prevention of crashes and injuries. Legislation is rated either Poor, Marginal, Fair or Good. Examples of what qualifies good ratings for several categories of legislation follow (direct excerpts):
|
Safety belt use laws GOOD: an administrative license revocation law that mandates at least a 30-day revocation for a violation with few or no exceptions for hardship; a law under which it's illegal to drive with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) at or above 0.08 percent; a readily enforceable law under which it's illegal for anyone younger than 21 to drive with any measurable BAC (enforcement is impeded in some states because police must suspect that a young driver has a high BAC before administering an alcohol test to check for any measurable BAC); and sobriety checkpoints must be permitted GOOD: law allows primary enforcement (police may stop and ticket motorists for belt law violations alone); fines and/or license points are imposed for violations; and law applies to occupants in rear as well as front seats Child restraint use laws GOOD: all children younger than 13 in all vehicle seats are required to ride in infant restraints, child seats, or safety belts; enforcement is primary (see above for definition of primary enforcement) Red light camera enforcement laws GOOD: law grants specific statewide authority for camera enforcement |
Source: Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, How State Laws Measure Up, 2000
Many of these legislative approaches have been shown to be effective. For example, an Insurance Institute for Highway Safety study showed that primary enforcement reduced annual passenger vehicle driver death rates by seven percent (Farmer and Williams, 2005). Additionally, Minnesotas high blood alcohol concentration (BAC) law, which imposes stiffer penalties on drivers found to have BACs above .20, has been found to successfully lower rates of recidivism (NHTSA, 2004, Enhanced Sanctions
). While laws like these may be tough to pass, they would go a long way in reducing vehicle crashes and protection children from TBIs.
Since a child under 14 is rarely the driver of the vehicle involved in a crash that results in a head injury, policies should be focused on the driver of the car who is often a parent. Parents and other adults can keep kids safe by making sure they are buckled up and in the proper car seat, and by making sure licensed drivers are driving safely. Some laws that reinforce this behavior are child passenger safety laws, which stipulate that children under a certain weight and/or height need to be in a certain type of seat designed for their size. Disobeying this law can result in fines for the parent. Child passenger seats are very important to protect young children from head injuries. Most states have laws that require use of child passenger restraints, but these laws vary from state to state. Minnesotas law requires that children under four be properly restrained in the proper child passenger restraint system.
Policies that prevent head injuries in young people due to motor vehicle crashes are numerous because any policy that prevents a crash from occurring would apply in this situation. We have to determine which of those strategies are most important.
Some studies have shown that interventions can be effective in increasing booster seat use. (Ehiri, 2006) These interventions include offering coupons or discounts on booster seats, free booster seats for low-income families, and educational programs. Incentive programs combined with education showed the most effect.
We can look to other municipalities to see how their policy strategies have affected seatbelt use. In Japan, seat belts are required, but there is an exemption for pregnant women. Ichikawa studied attitudes of pregnant Japanese women towards this law. (2003) They found that seatbelt use declined at 20 weeks gestation, but that pregnant women who were aware of the health benefits of wearing their seatbelt were more likely to wear their seatbelt, and women who knew about the exemption were less likely to wear their seatbelt. Although Minnesota does not have an exemption for pregnant women, we do have a secondary law, meaning that the law is only enforceable if a car has violated another traffic law. The results of the Japanese study could indicate that Minnesotans have similar attitudes towards seat belt use. Those who are aware of the benefits of wearing seat belts may be more likely to use them, while those who are aware of the secondary status of the law may be less likely to wear their seat belt.
One final technology that is relatively new is GPS (Global Positioning Systems) in new vehicles. These systems can automatically or manually alert emergency medical services (EMS) when a crash has occurred. These systems may reduce the time between the crash and the response of emergency services, possibly improving outcomes for someone who has suffered a TBI during a crash. Since these systems are so new, no research results are available about the effects on response times of emergency services for vehicles with these systems, but GPS system and its effect on EMS response time would be worth looking into more thoroughly.
Several barriers to improving the situation exist. First, many of the risk and contributing factors that could be changed are behavioral and very difficult to affect. These include drinking behaviors and restraint use. Another difficulty is in changing legislation to in turn affect these behaviors. Changes in legislation can be especially effective, but they also take a large investment of time and energy on the part of governmental bodies, non-profits and lobbyists. For example, a primary seat belt law has been in the works for at least six years in Minnesota. Finally, a less complicated barrier is the cost of child restraint systems. Lack of access to affordable car seats contributes to low use among low-income families. However, ninety-five percent of those families who do own a car seat utilize them.
If policies mandating seat belt use are so effective in increasing use, why are they so hard to get passed? Decision-makers are often not looking at problems from a public health perspective. A study done with Colorado legislators showed that 96% of legislators knew that seat belts reduced the risk of death, and 87% believed they saved lives, yet this knowledge was not enough for them to vote for a primary seat belt law (Lowenstein 1993). Legislators who voted for a law were likely to believe that their constituents favored the law and that the fact that seat belts saved lives was extremely important. A strong predictor of a no vote was the perception that a seat belt law was an imposition on personal freedom. When advocating for a seat belt laws and other policies that prevent injuries in general, advocates need to consider how supportive the general public is of a policy and frame the issue in ways that emphasize the publics health over individual freedoms.
Kids Health for Parents. http://kidshealth.org/parent/firstaid_safe/travel/auto.html.
American Academy of Pediatrics. Car Safety Seats. http://www.aap.org/family/carseatguide.htm.
Safe-A-Rooni is a web site that sends young people on a Safety Safari where they learn about the importance of buckling up. The web site is http://www.safe-a-rooni.org.
Mothers Against Drunk Driving has a program about staying safe while riding in a car with adults called Protecting You/Protecting Me. The web site is http://www.pypm.org.
The Minnesota Safety Council has a web site for kids that can be found at http://www.mnsafetycouncil.org/kids/index.htm.
The following contribution was made by Susan Jordan on December 13, 2011 who found this website very helpful as she did research for a special presentation. Through her research, she also discovered additional websites that complemented and provided further resources on this important topic; she has shared these below. Our thanks to Susan who has a major commitment to further enhance awareness about car safety and hopefully prevent adverse consequences to others in the future.
http://kidshealth.org/parent/firstaid_safe/outdoor/auto.html
http://www.cheapcarinsurance.net/car-safety-child-safety-seats
http://www.nhtsa.gov/Safety/CPS