![]() |
||
Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) |
||
|
Fate and Transport in the Environment Methods for Measuring Exposure Strategies for Preventing Exposure Methods for Monitoring in the Environment |
Dose Response Several published studies have attempted to show dose-response data on genetically modified foods in any animals but have not yielded useful results. Some of these studies attempt to feed animals whole food, others administer concentrated doses of the food, while others use the purified novel protein from the GM food. Nearly all of the GM foods that have been tested for toxicity have shown No Adverse Effect Levels (NOAELs) at dosages far beyond the expected level of human consumption.
Another example comes from transgenic varieties of tomato and sweet pepper that have increased resistance to a type of mosaic virus. Investigators carried out an acute toxicity assay, a micronucleus test, sperm aberration test, Ames test and 30-day animal feeding to assess the safety of the pepper and tomato. The acute toxicity test was used to assess the Median Lethal Dose (LD50). Rats were administered dosages up to 10g/kg body weight per day of lyophilized tomato and pepper powder for 1 week. The results yielded no signs of toxicity or mortality. The investigators concluded that the LD50 for these two GM vegetables was greater than 10g/kg body weight and that they were as safe as their non-GM counterparts. The other toxicity tests yielded similar results (Chen et al., 2003). Studies do exist that have shown toxic effects of GM foods in animals. The most well known involves a transgenic potato engineered to produce a natural insecticide (Ewen & Pusztai, 1999). In this study, rats were fed GM potatoes for ten days and presented toxic effects in their stomach linings. The results were controversial because there was disagreement over whether it was the novel protein causing the effects or a component of the genetic engineering process. It is unclear from the published study what dosage was administered to the rats and the authors made no determination of a NOAEL or LOAEL. |
|